1

Three bills were introduced in the Lok Sabha that sought to repeal and replace the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In the third installment, Project 39A has prepared the document comparing the proposed Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the current provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

1

Three bills were introduced in the Lok Sabha that sought to repeal and replace the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In the third installment, Project 39A has prepared the document comparing the proposed Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the current provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

1

Three bills were introduced in the Lok Sabha that sought to repeal and replace the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In the second installment, Project 39A has prepared the document comparing the proposed Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023 with the current provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

1

Three bills were introduced in the Lok Sabha that sought to repeal and replace the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In the first installment, Project 39A has prepared the document comparing the proposed Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill, 2023 (BNS) with the current provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

11

In the digital age, upholding justice is crucial, specifically in cases of NCII, where the current legal framework and terminology inadequately address the complexities, ultimately resulting in a lack of justice…The global outrage erupted in response to NCII has spurred concrete actions in various countries. India has no reason not to follow suit and can do so more efficiently

14

With vast experience on a wide range of human rights issues since 1985, Enakshi Ganguly, the co-founder of HAQ: Centre for Child Rights recently published her first book, ‘Juvenile, Not Delinquents: Children in Conflict With the Law’. The book, co-authored with Kalpana Purushothaman and Puneeta Roy, is a thought-provoking account of her experience working on child rights, powerfully arguing that we have failed to support vulnerable children in their path to reform. In this conversation with Snehal Dhote, Associate (Sentencing) at Project 39A, Enakshi discusses the book as well as her thoughts on child rights discourse.

11

This article examines the Dharmalingam case along with the issue of prosecutorial discretion that lies at the heart of a wider critique of section 33B of the Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Act 2012 that has made the mandatory death penalty discretionary for persons convicted for being ‘couriers’ in drug trafficking cases in Singapore. It argues that the provision is both procedurally and substantively arbitrary, and creates a misleading sense of individualised sentencing for drug trafficking in Singapore.