11
11 Min Read

This article probes the inconsistency in the Supreme Court’s professed commitment towards assessing reformation in capital sentencing against its reliance on life sentences excluding remission as a commuting sentence in death penalty cases.

16
16 Min Read

Digital evidence has been growing in relevance over the past several years. Most recently, in the ‘Newsclick’ investigation there were several reports of devices of journalists being seized. This raises an important question: can the police under the garb of investigation force one to open their electronic devices. The article argues that the right against self-incrimination protects against such compulsion by demonstrating that unlocking of devices (whether by password or biometrics) amounts to giving testimony. The article goes further to ask what happens in case a person willingly or without compulsion opens their device. The article explores the possibility of tampering of digital evidence and social realities in India to argue that all the contents of one’s device cannot be attributed to a person merely by virtue of being on a person’s device.

14
14 Min Read

The goal of this article is to ask, how do Courts judge whether or not the methodology through which a piece of evidence is presented is scientific or not (i.e. how does a Court make a determination about the foundational validity of scientific evidence)? What separates something like DNA evidence, in which our judicial system puts such high faith, from narco-analysis, which is generally deemed to be unreliable?

8
8 Min Read

In response to recent trial court proceedings in a case filed by the Delhi Police against members
of a news organisation under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 (UAPA), this piece
argues that an accused person has a right under Indian law to obtain a copy of the FIR
registered against her under S. 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). This right
is available at all stages of the criminal procedure, including prior to and during investigation.

1
1 Min Read

Three bills were introduced in the Lok Sabha that sought to repeal and replace the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.Ā This document is a substantive analysis of theĀ Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and theĀ Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023,Ā which aim to assess major changes being proposed to criminal procedure and evidence as they exist in theĀ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and theĀ Indian Evidence Act, 1872, respectively. In this substantive analysis of provisions, fourteen issues have been analysed in-depth. Other changes that do not receive a detailed assessment have been identified for the readerā€™s convenience. The document also contains aĀ comparative table towards the end that captures the introduction or modification of timelines through the BNSS for different stages of the criminal procedureĀ under the CrPC.