This article proposes that the Supreme Court’s judgement in Enforcement Directorate v. Kapil Wadhawan is a well-reasoned opinion that strengthens statutory bail, whose interpretive preferences are capable of being invoked to undermine the extinguishing regime.
Can the criminal justice system, as it stands today, address complex needs and treat families of victims justly? In this podcast, Dr. Penelope Tong and Baljeet Kaur discuss the need for the criminal justice system to expand its imagination of justice for families of murder victims.
In the digital age, upholding justice is crucial, specifically in cases of NCII, where the current legal framework and terminology inadequately address the complexities, ultimately resulting in a lack of justice…The global outrage erupted in response to NCII has spurred concrete actions in various countries. India has no reason not to follow suit and can do so more efficiently
In this podcast, Project 39A’s Director (Sentencing) Neetika Vishwanath speaks to Dr. Mayur Suresh (Senior Lecturer, SOAS University of London) on his recently published book ‘Terror Trials: Life and Law in Delhi’s Courts’. The book is an ethnographic study of Delhi’s Tis Hazari court over 14 months during which Dr. Suresh followed 18 terrorism trials. In this conversation, Dr. Suresh reflects on the relevance of ethnography as a method of legal research and the value of studying everyday life in trial courts. Looking beyond the exceptionalism framework in academia that is often used to describe terrorism laws and trials, ethnography allowed Dr. Suresh to capture ways in which terror accused use legal procedures and technicalities to engage with the law.
With vast experience on a wide range of human rights issues since 1985, Enakshi Ganguly, the co-founder of HAQ: Centre for Child Rights recently published her first book, âJuvenile, Not Delinquents: Children in Conflict With the Lawâ. The book, co-authored with Kalpana Purushothaman and Puneeta Roy, is a thought-provoking account of her experience working on child rights, powerfully arguing that we have failed to support vulnerable children in their path to reform. In this conversation with Snehal Dhote, Associate (Sentencing) at Project 39A, Enakshi discusses the book as well as her thoughts on child rights discourse.
This article examines the Dharmalingam case along with the issue of prosecutorial discretion that lies at the heart of a wider critique of section 33B of the Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Act 2012 that has made the mandatory death penalty discretionary for persons convicted for being âcouriersâ in drug trafficking cases in Singapore. It argues that the provision is both procedurally and substantively arbitrary, and creates a misleading sense of individualised sentencing for drug trafficking in Singapore.
This article seeks to provide a summary of the Supreme Courtâs recent judgement dated 24.03.2023 in Arup Bhuyan v State of Assam which overruled its previous decision in Arup Bhuyan v State of Assam, (2011) 3 SCC 377.
Project 39A recommends Jocelyn Simonsonâs article titled, âPolice Reform Through a Power Lens’.
Since the inception of the field of criminal law, through all its evolutions and transformations, an indispensable cog that is essential to make the wheels of effective criminal justice turn is that of ‘a witness.’ The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 was a first step towards securing rights for witnesses in India. However, unfortunately, the Scheme still remains riddled with problems in both its drafting and implementation. The present article aims to analyse a few questions which are required to be answered immediately, to bring the Scheme a step closer to what it set out to achieve.
The POCSO Act presumes an accused’s guilt through its reverse onus clauses. The basis for such clauses must be examined against a theoretical and legal framework in order to assess its suitability.